https://substack.com/profile/261158903-eronima/note/c-208277379 Full credit to Chris Diorio for his relentless, multi-year investigation and bravery in filing this whistleblower appeal. It takes immense courage to stare down the legal teams of firms like Knight Capital and Virtu. We are simply declassifying the findings to ensure the data reaches the public. Keep fighting the good fight, Chris.

// RESPECT THE RESEARCH. #GME#MMTLP#NakedShorts#MarketStructure Entertainment purposes only • DYOR

he FBI secretly deployed more than 250 plainclothes agents to the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, an operation so disorganized it unleashed searing frustrations among many of the FBI’s rank-and-file that the bureau had lost its core competencies to “wokeness” and allowed its employees to become “pawns in a political war,” according to an after-action report kept from the public for more than four years.

Scores of FBI agents and personnel – many from the bureau’s premier Washington field office (WFO) – sent anonymous complaints to the after-action team detailing how agents were sent into an unsafe scenario without proper safety equipment or the ability to identify themselves readily as armed officers to other police agencies, the report obtained by Just the News shows.

The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.

“The FBI should make clear to its personnel and the public that, despite its obvious political bias, it ultimately still takes its mission and priorities seriously,” one employee wrote in a stinging review. “It should equally and aggressively investigate criminal activity regardless of the offenders’ perceived race, political affiliations, or motivations; and it should equally and aggressively protect all Americans regardless of perceived race, political affiliations, or motivations.”

That agent urged FBI leaders “to identify viable exit options for FBI personnel who no longer feel it is legally or morally acceptable to support a federal law enforcement and intelligence agency motivated by political bias.”

One agent suggested the problem extended beyond the bureau to D.C. U.S. Attorney’s office, indicating a more widespread problem with political bias. 

“Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions,” the agent wrote. “However, their willingness to conduct a search warrant on someone’s life for a misdemeanor seems ridiculous. It is unreasonable for the FBI to conduct investigations involving misdemeanor violations at a federal level… it is not our role.”

Many of the agents’ feedback focused on the Washington Field Office and its culture. “WFO is a hopelessly broken office that’s more concerned about wearing masks and recruiting preferred racial/sexual groups than catching actual bad guys,” one worker wrote.

Added another: “I wish you all would pay more attention to our safety than what type of masks we wear. If you are going to deploy us to a riot situation, then give us the proper damn safety equipment–helmet, face shield, protective clothing–and training!”

The after-action responses – 50 pages in all – were located by current FBI Director Kash Patel’s team and recently turned over to the House Judiciary Committee and its special subcommittee investigating security failures and weaponization of law enforcement during the Jan. 6 riot.

274 undercover agents embedded in riot , with no safety plans

The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot.

You can read the after-action report below:

File

FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

Wray, Patel’s predecessor, steadfastly refused to tell Congress how many if any agents went to the Capitol that day. And a prior DOJ Inspector General Report did not divulge the number, referring only to a SWAT team the bureau sent into the Capitol and having more than two dozen informants in the crowd.

The existence of mass FBI agents at the Capitol on Jan. 6  could also be a problem in many of the cases that were subsequently brought in court. If agents were witnesses at the Capitol and did not disclose it in the subsequent affidavits during prosecutions it could create grounds for defendants to appeal.

The document also reveals for the first time that there were widespread concerns for years inside the bureau – sentiments that boiled over after the FBI began sending SWAT teams to arrest Jan. 6 participants on misdemeanor charges – that the FBI had become biased in favor of liberals and against conservatives.

Despite the pre-existing report, Wray rejected that notion in testimony before Congress. “The idea that I’m biased against conservatives seems somewhat insane to me, given my own personal background,” Wray told Congress in 2023. 

“I have found almost invariably, the people screaming the loudest about the politicization of the FBI are themselves the most political, and more often than not, making claims of politicization to advance their own views or goals, and they often don’t know the facts or are choosing to ignore them,” Wray added in an episode of the podcast “FBI Retired Case File Review” that aired the same year. 

Agent: “Our response to the Capitol Riot reeks of political bias” 

But frontline agents repeatedly raised issues of liberal bias and wokeness in their after-action assessments. The words “politics” or “bias” were mentioned more than a dozen times in responses, and similar sentiments scores of times in the 50 pages.

“Our response to the Capitol Riot reeks of political bias,” one wrote.

Another added: “I wonder if our biases affected our preparedness.”

A third suggested the agents and analysts had become engrossed in the main business of Washington – politics – rather than crime fighting and blamed the bureau’s leadership for the slide.

“We have been used as pawns in a political war, and FBI leadership fell into the trap and has allowed it to happen,” that employee wrote. “We are supposed to call balls and strikes, regardless of political pressure, now we can’t even be trusted to be on the field,” another agent commented.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan vowed through a spokesman to get to the bottom of the still-untold secrets of Jan. 6 alongside of the Jan. 6 subcommittee chairman Barry Loudermilk.

“Due to our oversight, Chairman Loudermilk’s leadership and Director Patel’s leadership, we continue to discover what exactly happened on Jan. 6,” Jordan’s spokesman Russell Dye told Just the News.

“During the more than two years I have been investigating the events of January 6, I have seen evidence that suggests potential political bias within agencies that may have influenced their actions before, during, and after the events of January 6. But this report is more damning than anyone could have imagined and opens up even more questions,” Loudermilk told Just the News. 

“Why is Congress just finding out there were significantly more FBI assets at the Capitol than previously identified? Were the courts that heard cases regarding January 6 made aware these agents were at the Capitol? Were any of the agents tasked to investigate individuals at the Capitol? Were they ever called to testify during the prosecutions of J6 defendants? Did any of the former FBI leaders testify about the additional personnel at the Capitol? These are just a few of the questions my committee will be asking,” said the chairman. 

The report solves one of the Jan. 6 mysteries: How did the FBI respond when violence began breaking out at the Capitol? Wray previously refused to divulge to Congress how many agents or informants were present during the incident. 

“The initial response of having us again respond to a riot by ‘standing the line’ did not seem appropriate because we do not have the gear, equipment, or training for riot control,” one agent said. 

“As in June, agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD. No other direction. When asked specifically what they were supposed to do or who to check in with, they were told simply that management said to go there and there was no answer,” another said. “FBI agents do not have training for, nor equipment for, riot control.”

Agents complained of politically-motivated “double standard”

The report also revealed agents strongly disagreed with how they were deployed and how cases were pursued after that day, seeing a double standard.

“The actions on January 6, 2021 were absolutely despicable and unacceptable in a civilized society. What is even more unacceptable was the hypocrisy displayed by the FBI and its leadership in their attempt to go after those involved in the Capitol Riots, while we as agents, watched cities burn across America during the summer of 2020,” one agent said. 

“The conspiracy to commit crimes at the Capitol on January 6th, were also committed by bad actors during the summer riots of 2020 leading up to the election on November 3, 2020. Agents stood by on the ground in Washington, D.C. and observed stores being looted, burned, and ripped of anything of value,” the agent wrote.

“Even worse, officers were assaulted in the streets in broad daylight with cameras rolling, and yet our response then was nothing like the Capitol Riots response on and after January 6, 2021. I do not recall a single instance where the FBI, specifically FBI WFO, made any attempt to put the resources behind the summer riots of 2020, as they did during the Capitol Riots,” the agent explained. 

The scathing comments from Washington Field Office agents assessing their own bureau’s work that day were not included in an Office of Inspector General report reviewing the FBI’s performance in the lead up to and during the Jan. 6 electoral certification. That report only confirmed that there were “several hundred” agents deployed, but provided no further detail about the challenges they faced or their complaints. 

But peel back the “trad wife” veneer, and you’ll find something darker.

2.
She ran Romanian Angels, an “orphan ministry” in Constanța, Romania.
Locals accused it of trafficking children under the guise of mission work.
Exactly the model exposed in Clinton Foundation scandals & Guatamala through ‘Save The Children.’
Those Romanian “orphans” are exported to UK, Israel, and undisclosed islands.

“Philanthropy” or pipeline?

3.
Her résumé writes itself like a honeypot manual:

• Trump’s Miss Arizona, 2012 (Trump-owned pageant).
• Casting director.
• Founder of multiple “nonprofits” with orphan projects.
• Married into MAGA’s golden boy after falling in love over an interview set up by Trump’s team.

That’s not coincidence. That’s placement.

4.
Her father? DoD + Raytheon, Israeli division.
Her parents? Prominent Zionists.
Her grandfather?
Carl Kenneth Frantzve
Vice President of American Bank Note Co. (yes, the ones tied to secure printing & IDs), was Grand Chief of the Independent Order of Vikings, knighted by the King of Sweden.

This is not some random “trad wife.”
She was wealthy before knowing Charlie.

5.
Zoom out.
The architecture is déjà vu:

• Roy Cohn built the CIA sex-kitten blackmail machine.
• Trump owned pageants & hotels perfect leverage farms.
• Epstein wasn’t a fluke, he was a franchise plug-in.

Erika’s pageant-to-“angel” trajectory fits the blueprint.
Why would a young multimillionaire from an initiated family become a Trump pageant girl?.. unless.

Erika attended a Jesuit University, REGIS University located in Denver CO.
Guess who else attended a Jesuit School…

Again, Erika was recruited into modeling, her first pageants were Donald Trump-owned Miss USA pageants, winning Miss Arizona in 2012.

Was she set up for Charlie the way Melania was set up for Donnie?
Brought to the U.S. by Paolo Zampolli
a modeling agent with ties to Mossad, Epstein’s orbit, and elite trafficking rings.

Starting to notice a pattern here?

6.
Even the branding repeats:

• “Tate’s Angels” the cam-girl/trafficking ring.
• “Romanian Angels” Erika’s orphan project accused of trafficking.
• “Angels” as cover for export pipelines of flesh. On the younger side..

This isn’t religious branding. It’s operational branding.

7.
Meanwhile Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA UK launched at the Royal Automobile Club under Prince Michael of Kent, Grandmaster of Freemasonry.
George Farmer (Candace Owens’ husband) sat as Chairman, tied to Andrew Tate long before Candace.

Controlled networks, every link in place.
And George Farmer, Candace’s elite husband ties Tate’s Angels to Erika.

8.
So ask yourself:
Is Erika Kirk the grieving trad wife…
or the CIA-Mossad honeypot who just inherited the keys to MAGA’s youth machine?
Did she pay her dues and rite of passage?

Charlie’s political machine didn’t collapse.
It was transferred.
Resurrected through his ritual death.

“All of them. All of them,” Ladapo responded, referencing vaccine mandates during a news conference, prompting the crowd to rise in applause. “Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.”

Nonetheless, the state is not banning vaccinations altogether, and he noted that the Florida Department of Health will coordinate efforts with Governor Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.).

“Who am I as a government or anyone else, who am I as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?” Ladapo continued. “Who am I to tell you what your child should put in [their] body? I don’t have that right.”

Currently, Florida requires students attending public schools to be vaccinated, with specific requirements detailed on the Florida Department of Health website.

“You want to put whatever different vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision,” Ladapo added. “You don’t want to put whatever vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. That’s how it should be.”

Dr. Robert Malone, recently appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the CDC’s independent vaccine advisory committee, wrote on X that he spoke with Ladapo on Tuesday, describing him as “a measured scientist who is on fire to change the system for the better.”

As a member of the advisory committee, Malone plays a key role in shaping CDC recommendations on vaccine eligibility. He has also been a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines.

However, critics of the decision soon chimed in to express their frustration as well.

“The idea that children would be allowed to go to school unvaccinated is absolutely frightening,” said Dr. Richard Besser, a former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Additionally, Dr. Susan Kressly, the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, underscored what she described as the “critical role” of childhood vaccinations in a statement.

“We are concerned that today’s announcement by Gov. DeSantis will put children in Florida public schools at higher risk for getting sick, and have ripple effects across their community,” Kressly said.

Ladapo’s announcement coincides with Governor DeSantis’ unveiling of Florida’s “Make America Healthy Again” commission, tasked with recommending ways to implement President Donald Trump and Health Secretary Kennedy’s initiative at the state level.

The commission will be chaired by First Lady Casey DeSantis and Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, with Ladapo, Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Shevaun Harris, and Department of Children and Families Secretary Taylor Hatch serving as members as well.

“They’ll be manufactured largely by robots at a Zuru factory in China and shipped across the Pacific to Malibu, where they’ll be assembled right here along the coast.

Zuru claims it can deliver these homes for the shockingly low production cost of $300 per square meter, which is just $28 per square foot. A mere fraction of Malibu’s average cost to build, which goes up to $2, 000 a square foot.

That means a 2700 square foot home would only cost about a hundred thousand dollars to produce and ship, then sell for a projected $10 to $30 million dollars.”

Put any negative effects people had from mRNA ‘vaccines’ into the “unvaccinated” group.

This hid vaccine injuries, deaths and gave the appearance the unvaccinated were getting sick and dying more. “The offical data do not not count you as vaccinated until 2 weeks after the second shot”

“The deaths that happened during that first 6 weeks are attributed to unvaccinated people [so] it’s a trick, it’s statistical trick”

They do this “little trick” on other traditional vaccines as well.

https://www.tiktok.com/@h3r3t1c2/video/7547150481949281566

These numbers are compiled from hospital records, morgues, and direct reports from medical teams, focusing on confirmed deaths where bodies have been identified or recovered.Recent daily breakdowns illustrate the ongoing violence:

• July 12: 59 killed, 208 injured.
• July 11: 61 killed, 231 injured.
• July 10: Over 100 killed in airstrikes across the Strip.

The ministry emphasizes that women and children constitute more than half of the fatalities—approximately 70% in some breakdowns—with at least 17,400 children among the dead.

Additionally, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) echoes these figures, noting 57,680 deaths as of July 9, 2025, and highlighting that breakdowns by age and gender are based on fully identified victims up to mid-June.

However, the ministry itself acknowledges limitations: Thousands remain missing under rubble, and the collapse of Gaza’s health system— with most hospitals destroyed or non-functional—means many deaths go unrecorded.Independent Studies: Estimates Pushing Toward 100,000 and BeyondSeveral peer-reviewed and independent analyses indicate the official toll undercounts the reality by 40% or more, factoring in unreported violent deaths, indirect fatalities from the humanitarian crisis, and bodies not recovered.A groundbreaking study published in June 2025, led by Michael Spagat from the University of London and conducted with the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), surveyed 2,000 representative households in Gaza. It estimated 75,200 violent deaths from October 7, 2023, to January 5, 2025—40% higher than the ministry’s 45,650 for the same period. Adding 8,540 indirect deaths from starvation, disease, and siege conditions brings the total to over 83,740 by early January 2025.

Projecting forward amid continued fighting, experts suggest the toll could now surpass 100,000.This aligns with earlier research:

• A January 2025 study in The Lancet compared social media obituaries and ministry data, finding underreporting by up to 41%, estimating the toll 40% higher than official figures at that time. A May 2025 Press TV report cited estimates of up to 109,000 deaths.
• The Associated Press and other outlets noted in June 2025 that over 55,000 had been killed, with many more believed buried under debris.
• These studies rely on household surveys, statistical modeling, and cross-referencing with alternative data sources like obituaries, avoiding direct dependence on ministry records to ensure independence.Reasons for Discrepancies: Rubble, Siege, and Access IssuesThe gap between official and estimated figures stems from several factors inherent to the conflict’s brutality:
• Unrecovered Bodies: With 80-90% of Gaza’s buildings damaged or destroyed, thousands are presumed dead under rubble. The ministry lists around 11,000 missing, but surveys suggest this is conservative.
• Indirect Deaths: Starvation, disease outbreaks (e.g., 484 suspected meningitis cases in June 2025), and lack of medical care have killed thousands more. The UN estimates over 1.9 million displaced, exacerbating these issues.
• Collapsed Infrastructure: Gaza’s health system is in ruins, limiting body identification and reporting. Attacks on aid hubs have killed nearly 800 while seeking food or water between May and July 2025.
• Access Restrictions: Israeli military operations seal off areas, preventing surveys or rescues. The Spagat study avoided active combat zones, potentially underestimating in high-risk areas.

Experts like those in the Spagat study note that while the ministry’s data is demographically accurate (e.g., high proportions of women, children, and elderly), it misses the full scope due to these barriers.Breakdown of Casualties: Civilians, Combatants, and Vulnerables

The Spagat study does not separate combatants from civilians, citing risks to researchers if probing Hamas affiliations.

Israeli officials argue the ministry inflates civilian deaths by including combatants, but UN analyses have historically validated the ministry’s accuracy in past conflicts.Perspectives from All Sides: Disputes and Denials

• Palestinian View: The Health Ministry and groups like WAFA describe the toll as part of an “ongoing genocide,” emphasizing civilian suffering and calling for international intervention.
• Israeli Perspective: Israel dismisses ministry figures as “Hamas propaganda,” claiming most deaths are combatants and that civilian casualties result from Hamas’ use of human shields. No official Israeli casualty estimate is provided, but officials highlight efforts to minimize harm.
• International Bodies: The UN, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch accept ministry data as credible baselines but urge accounting for underreporting. A UN expert group in May 2025 cited over 52,535 deaths (70% women/children) and warned of “unfolding genocide.”
• Media and Experts: Outlets like Al Jazeera and AP report daily strikes killing dozens, often at aid points. Discussions on X (formerly Twitter) reflect polarization, with some users projecting tolls over 100,000 based on studies, while others dispute them.

The Human Cost: Beyond NumbersWhether 58,000 or 100,000, each figure represents erased lives amid a humanitarian catastrophe. Over 1.9 million Palestinians remain displaced, with famine looming and diseases spreading. Birth rates offer a grim counterpoint—potentially 108,000 new Gazans since October 2023—but survival rates plummet. As one X user poignantly noted, “The silence over the horrific death toll in Gaza speaks volumes.”

The true toll may never be fully known without a ceasefire and comprehensive investigation. Until then, estimates like those projecting 100,000 dead serve as a stark reminder: The war’s cost is measured not just in bodies, but in shattered futures.