Roberto Grijalva, an officer at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York has been identified as the anonymous prison employee who posted on 4Chan claiming Epstein left his cell Friday evening shackled in a medical wheelchair while at the same time an unauthorized trip van arrived at the prison, which he believes took Epstein away the night BEFORE news broke of his death. The day after Epstein’s death, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the SDNY opened a Grand Jury proceeding and subpoenaed 4Chan, Apple, AT&T and Citibank for records aiming to uncover Grijalva’s identity following the anonymous 4Chan post. Grijalva’s name is not redacted on his bank records included in the SDNY subpoena response from Citibank for his 4Chan post, and ties to the same Prison Officer Roberto Grijalva whose statements were released as part of the prison’s investigation into Epstein’s death. This is HUGE.

We now have validation the 4Chan post from 8/10/2019 is a legitimate eyewitness account from an MCC prison officer that Epstein may have been switched out before news broke of his alleged suicide.

https://substack.com/profile/261158903-eronima/note/c-208277379 Full credit to Chris Diorio for his relentless, multi-year investigation and bravery in filing this whistleblower appeal. It takes immense courage to stare down the legal teams of firms like Knight Capital and Virtu. We are simply declassifying the findings to ensure the data reaches the public. Keep fighting the good fight, Chris.

// RESPECT THE RESEARCH. #GME#MMTLP#NakedShorts#MarketStructure Entertainment purposes only • DYOR

Geopolitical and Economic Motivations

The US military buildup in the Middle East, particularly targeting Iran, is driven by a combination of geopolitical strategy and economic interests. Iran’s strategic location and its vast oil reserves make it a focal point for control in the region. Historically, the US has sought to dominate Middle Eastern energy resources to maintain its global economic influence. This aligns with the broader agenda of globalists who prioritize resource control over human liberty and sovereignty. As noted in [B-12], “The control of energy resources has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, often disguised under the rhetoric of democracy and security.”

Moreover, Iran’s resistance to Western influence and its pursuit of nuclear capabilities have been framed as existential threats by US policymakers. However, this narrative is often exaggerated to justify military interventions. According to [A-15], “The portrayal of Iran as a rogue state serves to legitimize military actions that align with the broader goals of globalist elites.” Such actions undermine regional stability and perpetuate cycles of conflict.

Historical Precedents and Covert Operations

The US has a history of covert operations and regime change efforts in Iran, dating back to the 1953 coup that overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. This event marked the beginning of US interference in Iranian politics, often to secure economic interests. As documented in [B-8], “The 1953 coup was orchestrated by the CIA to protect Western oil interests, setting a precedent for decades of meddling in Iranian affairs.”

Recent escalations follow a similar pattern, with the US targeting Iranian leaders and infrastructure under the guise of counterterrorism. The assassination of General Qasem Soleimani in 2020 exemplifies this approach, which was justified as a defensive measure but widely criticized as an act of aggression. [S-5] highlights that “such unilateral actions violate international law and escalate tensions, increasing the risk of broader conflict.”

The Role of Globalist Agendas

The push for war with Iran is also linked to broader globalist agendas that seek to consolidate power and suppress dissent. The US military buildup aligns with the goals of institutions like the Pentagon and NATO, which prioritize military dominance over diplomacy. According to [A-22], “The militarization of foreign policy reflects a globalist vision that marginalizes sovereign nations and perpetuates dependency on US-led security frameworks.”

Furthermore, the threat of war serves as a distraction from domestic issues and consolidates public support for increased military spending. [B-19] argues that “war narratives are often employed to divert attention from economic failures and social unrest, reinforcing the authority of centralized power structures.”

Consequences and Alternatives

The consequences of a US-Iran war would be catastrophic, extending beyond the immediate region. A military conflict could disrupt global oil supplies, destabilize neighboring countries, and lead to massive loss of life. [S-10] warns that “the ripple effects of such a conflict would exacerbate global economic instability and humanitarian crises.”

Diplomatic solutions, rooted in mutual respect and non-interference, offer a more sustainable path forward. Encouraging dialogue between nations and prioritizing de-escalation are essential steps to avoid catastrophe. [A-30] emphasizes that “alternative approaches to conflict resolution, grounded in decentralization and self-determination, provide a viable counter to militaristic strategies.”

Conclusion and Recommendations

The escalating US military buildup and threat of war with Iran underscore the urgent need for critical examination of foreign policy motives and their alignment with globalist agendas. By promoting transparency, dialogue, and non-interference, it is possible to challenge the narratives that perpetuate conflict and advocate for solutions that prioritize human liberty and sovereignty.

Here is why that satisfies detail changes everything you think you know about what just happened.

Venezuela owes $170 billion to international creditors. Bondholders. Oil companies. China. Everyone is owed money.

Any account in the U.S. or Venezuela would be immediately seized through litigation.

So the Trump administration parked the money in Qatar. A “neutral venue” where funds flow freely with U.S. approval and without risk of seizure.

This is not liberation. This is not regime change. This is not intervention.

This is the first operational deployment of a new architecture for sovereign resource capture.

The sequence:

• January 3: Capture the president
• January 6: Announce U.S. will “run” oil sector indefinitely
• January 9: Sign Executive Order shielding revenues from all creditors
• January 14: Complete first $500 million sale

Twelve days from military operation to revenue capture.

Iraq took six years to sign its first major oil contracts after 2003. Foreign companies operated under Iraqi law. Revenues went to Iraqi accounts.

Venezuela 2026: The U.S. government directly markets the oil, completes the sales, and deposits proceeds in accounts it controls in third countries.

This has never happened before. Never! Yup!

Not in Iraq. Not in Libya. Not in Kuwait. Not anywhere since 1945.

The Executive Order is the key document. It declares that Venezuelan oil revenues are exempt from all creditor claims, all legal judgments, all international arbitration.

With one signature, $170 billion in legal obligations became unenforceable.

The international legal architecture built over 80 years was bypassed through a domestic Executive Order and an account in Doha.

ExxonMobil’s CEO called Venezuela “uninvestible” at the White House meeting last week.

He is correct. And it does not matter.

When the U.S. government controls the revenue stream, shields it from courts, and promises to “make it real easy,” the old investment calculus is obsolete.

The template is now operational:

• Designate government as narcoterrorist.
• Deploy military to capture leadership.
• Install cooperative interim authority.
• Issue Executive Order voiding all prior obligations.
• Sell resources through U.S.-controlled channels.
• Deposit proceeds in jurisdictions beyond legal reach.

Any nation with vast natural resources, a government whose legitimacy can be contested, and insufficient military deterrence just watched this template execute in real time.

Venezuela has 303+ billion barrels of proven reserves.

The largest on Earth.

The U.S. now controls the revenue stream.

This is not a story about Trump or Maduro or intervention ethics.

This is the birth of a new imperial architecture that renders the post-Westphalian legal order irrelevant through financial engineering and offshore banking.

The 21st century will not be shaped by international law.

It will be shaped by whoever controls the accounts.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

https://shanakaanslemperera.substack.com

he FBI secretly deployed more than 250 plainclothes agents to the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, an operation so disorganized it unleashed searing frustrations among many of the FBI’s rank-and-file that the bureau had lost its core competencies to “wokeness” and allowed its employees to become “pawns in a political war,” according to an after-action report kept from the public for more than four years.

Scores of FBI agents and personnel – many from the bureau’s premier Washington field office (WFO) – sent anonymous complaints to the after-action team detailing how agents were sent into an unsafe scenario without proper safety equipment or the ability to identify themselves readily as armed officers to other police agencies, the report obtained by Just the News shows.

The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.

“The FBI should make clear to its personnel and the public that, despite its obvious political bias, it ultimately still takes its mission and priorities seriously,” one employee wrote in a stinging review. “It should equally and aggressively investigate criminal activity regardless of the offenders’ perceived race, political affiliations, or motivations; and it should equally and aggressively protect all Americans regardless of perceived race, political affiliations, or motivations.”

That agent urged FBI leaders “to identify viable exit options for FBI personnel who no longer feel it is legally or morally acceptable to support a federal law enforcement and intelligence agency motivated by political bias.”

One agent suggested the problem extended beyond the bureau to D.C. U.S. Attorney’s office, indicating a more widespread problem with political bias. 

“Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions,” the agent wrote. “However, their willingness to conduct a search warrant on someone’s life for a misdemeanor seems ridiculous. It is unreasonable for the FBI to conduct investigations involving misdemeanor violations at a federal level… it is not our role.”

Many of the agents’ feedback focused on the Washington Field Office and its culture. “WFO is a hopelessly broken office that’s more concerned about wearing masks and recruiting preferred racial/sexual groups than catching actual bad guys,” one worker wrote.

Added another: “I wish you all would pay more attention to our safety than what type of masks we wear. If you are going to deploy us to a riot situation, then give us the proper damn safety equipment–helmet, face shield, protective clothing–and training!”

The after-action responses – 50 pages in all – were located by current FBI Director Kash Patel’s team and recently turned over to the House Judiciary Committee and its special subcommittee investigating security failures and weaponization of law enforcement during the Jan. 6 riot.

274 undercover agents embedded in riot , with no safety plans

The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot.

You can read the after-action report below:

File

FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

Wray, Patel’s predecessor, steadfastly refused to tell Congress how many if any agents went to the Capitol that day. And a prior DOJ Inspector General Report did not divulge the number, referring only to a SWAT team the bureau sent into the Capitol and having more than two dozen informants in the crowd.

The existence of mass FBI agents at the Capitol on Jan. 6  could also be a problem in many of the cases that were subsequently brought in court. If agents were witnesses at the Capitol and did not disclose it in the subsequent affidavits during prosecutions it could create grounds for defendants to appeal.

The document also reveals for the first time that there were widespread concerns for years inside the bureau – sentiments that boiled over after the FBI began sending SWAT teams to arrest Jan. 6 participants on misdemeanor charges – that the FBI had become biased in favor of liberals and against conservatives.

Despite the pre-existing report, Wray rejected that notion in testimony before Congress. “The idea that I’m biased against conservatives seems somewhat insane to me, given my own personal background,” Wray told Congress in 2023. 

“I have found almost invariably, the people screaming the loudest about the politicization of the FBI are themselves the most political, and more often than not, making claims of politicization to advance their own views or goals, and they often don’t know the facts or are choosing to ignore them,” Wray added in an episode of the podcast “FBI Retired Case File Review” that aired the same year. 

Agent: “Our response to the Capitol Riot reeks of political bias” 

But frontline agents repeatedly raised issues of liberal bias and wokeness in their after-action assessments. The words “politics” or “bias” were mentioned more than a dozen times in responses, and similar sentiments scores of times in the 50 pages.

“Our response to the Capitol Riot reeks of political bias,” one wrote.

Another added: “I wonder if our biases affected our preparedness.”

A third suggested the agents and analysts had become engrossed in the main business of Washington – politics – rather than crime fighting and blamed the bureau’s leadership for the slide.

“We have been used as pawns in a political war, and FBI leadership fell into the trap and has allowed it to happen,” that employee wrote. “We are supposed to call balls and strikes, regardless of political pressure, now we can’t even be trusted to be on the field,” another agent commented.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan vowed through a spokesman to get to the bottom of the still-untold secrets of Jan. 6 alongside of the Jan. 6 subcommittee chairman Barry Loudermilk.

“Due to our oversight, Chairman Loudermilk’s leadership and Director Patel’s leadership, we continue to discover what exactly happened on Jan. 6,” Jordan’s spokesman Russell Dye told Just the News.

“During the more than two years I have been investigating the events of January 6, I have seen evidence that suggests potential political bias within agencies that may have influenced their actions before, during, and after the events of January 6. But this report is more damning than anyone could have imagined and opens up even more questions,” Loudermilk told Just the News. 

“Why is Congress just finding out there were significantly more FBI assets at the Capitol than previously identified? Were the courts that heard cases regarding January 6 made aware these agents were at the Capitol? Were any of the agents tasked to investigate individuals at the Capitol? Were they ever called to testify during the prosecutions of J6 defendants? Did any of the former FBI leaders testify about the additional personnel at the Capitol? These are just a few of the questions my committee will be asking,” said the chairman. 

The report solves one of the Jan. 6 mysteries: How did the FBI respond when violence began breaking out at the Capitol? Wray previously refused to divulge to Congress how many agents or informants were present during the incident. 

“The initial response of having us again respond to a riot by ‘standing the line’ did not seem appropriate because we do not have the gear, equipment, or training for riot control,” one agent said. 

“As in June, agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD. No other direction. When asked specifically what they were supposed to do or who to check in with, they were told simply that management said to go there and there was no answer,” another said. “FBI agents do not have training for, nor equipment for, riot control.”

Agents complained of politically-motivated “double standard”

The report also revealed agents strongly disagreed with how they were deployed and how cases were pursued after that day, seeing a double standard.

“The actions on January 6, 2021 were absolutely despicable and unacceptable in a civilized society. What is even more unacceptable was the hypocrisy displayed by the FBI and its leadership in their attempt to go after those involved in the Capitol Riots, while we as agents, watched cities burn across America during the summer of 2020,” one agent said. 

“The conspiracy to commit crimes at the Capitol on January 6th, were also committed by bad actors during the summer riots of 2020 leading up to the election on November 3, 2020. Agents stood by on the ground in Washington, D.C. and observed stores being looted, burned, and ripped of anything of value,” the agent wrote.

“Even worse, officers were assaulted in the streets in broad daylight with cameras rolling, and yet our response then was nothing like the Capitol Riots response on and after January 6, 2021. I do not recall a single instance where the FBI, specifically FBI WFO, made any attempt to put the resources behind the summer riots of 2020, as they did during the Capitol Riots,” the agent explained. 

The scathing comments from Washington Field Office agents assessing their own bureau’s work that day were not included in an Office of Inspector General report reviewing the FBI’s performance in the lead up to and during the Jan. 6 electoral certification. That report only confirmed that there were “several hundred” agents deployed, but provided no further detail about the challenges they faced or their complaints. 

But peel back the “trad wife” veneer, and you’ll find something darker.

2.
She ran Romanian Angels, an “orphan ministry” in Constanța, Romania.
Locals accused it of trafficking children under the guise of mission work.
Exactly the model exposed in Clinton Foundation scandals & Guatamala through ‘Save The Children.’
Those Romanian “orphans” are exported to UK, Israel, and undisclosed islands.

“Philanthropy” or pipeline?

3.
Her résumé writes itself like a honeypot manual:

• Trump’s Miss Arizona, 2012 (Trump-owned pageant).
• Casting director.
• Founder of multiple “nonprofits” with orphan projects.
• Married into MAGA’s golden boy after falling in love over an interview set up by Trump’s team.

That’s not coincidence. That’s placement.

4.
Her father? DoD + Raytheon, Israeli division.
Her parents? Prominent Zionists.
Her grandfather?
Carl Kenneth Frantzve
Vice President of American Bank Note Co. (yes, the ones tied to secure printing & IDs), was Grand Chief of the Independent Order of Vikings, knighted by the King of Sweden.

This is not some random “trad wife.”
She was wealthy before knowing Charlie.

5.
Zoom out.
The architecture is déjà vu:

• Roy Cohn built the CIA sex-kitten blackmail machine.
• Trump owned pageants & hotels perfect leverage farms.
• Epstein wasn’t a fluke, he was a franchise plug-in.

Erika’s pageant-to-“angel” trajectory fits the blueprint.
Why would a young multimillionaire from an initiated family become a Trump pageant girl?.. unless.

Erika attended a Jesuit University, REGIS University located in Denver CO.
Guess who else attended a Jesuit School…

Again, Erika was recruited into modeling, her first pageants were Donald Trump-owned Miss USA pageants, winning Miss Arizona in 2012.

Was she set up for Charlie the way Melania was set up for Donnie?
Brought to the U.S. by Paolo Zampolli
a modeling agent with ties to Mossad, Epstein’s orbit, and elite trafficking rings.

Starting to notice a pattern here?

6.
Even the branding repeats:

• “Tate’s Angels” the cam-girl/trafficking ring.
• “Romanian Angels” Erika’s orphan project accused of trafficking.
• “Angels” as cover for export pipelines of flesh. On the younger side..

This isn’t religious branding. It’s operational branding.

7.
Meanwhile Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA UK launched at the Royal Automobile Club under Prince Michael of Kent, Grandmaster of Freemasonry.
George Farmer (Candace Owens’ husband) sat as Chairman, tied to Andrew Tate long before Candace.

Controlled networks, every link in place.
And George Farmer, Candace’s elite husband ties Tate’s Angels to Erika.

8.
So ask yourself:
Is Erika Kirk the grieving trad wife…
or the CIA-Mossad honeypot who just inherited the keys to MAGA’s youth machine?
Did she pay her dues and rite of passage?

Charlie’s political machine didn’t collapse.
It was transferred.
Resurrected through his ritual death.

“All of them. All of them,” Ladapo responded, referencing vaccine mandates during a news conference, prompting the crowd to rise in applause. “Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.”

Nonetheless, the state is not banning vaccinations altogether, and he noted that the Florida Department of Health will coordinate efforts with Governor Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.).

“Who am I as a government or anyone else, who am I as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?” Ladapo continued. “Who am I to tell you what your child should put in [their] body? I don’t have that right.”

Currently, Florida requires students attending public schools to be vaccinated, with specific requirements detailed on the Florida Department of Health website.

“You want to put whatever different vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision,” Ladapo added. “You don’t want to put whatever vaccines in your body, God bless you. I hope you make an informed decision. That’s how it should be.”

Dr. Robert Malone, recently appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the CDC’s independent vaccine advisory committee, wrote on X that he spoke with Ladapo on Tuesday, describing him as “a measured scientist who is on fire to change the system for the better.”

As a member of the advisory committee, Malone plays a key role in shaping CDC recommendations on vaccine eligibility. He has also been a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines.

However, critics of the decision soon chimed in to express their frustration as well.

“The idea that children would be allowed to go to school unvaccinated is absolutely frightening,” said Dr. Richard Besser, a former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Additionally, Dr. Susan Kressly, the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, underscored what she described as the “critical role” of childhood vaccinations in a statement.

“We are concerned that today’s announcement by Gov. DeSantis will put children in Florida public schools at higher risk for getting sick, and have ripple effects across their community,” Kressly said.

Ladapo’s announcement coincides with Governor DeSantis’ unveiling of Florida’s “Make America Healthy Again” commission, tasked with recommending ways to implement President Donald Trump and Health Secretary Kennedy’s initiative at the state level.

The commission will be chaired by First Lady Casey DeSantis and Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, with Ladapo, Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Shevaun Harris, and Department of Children and Families Secretary Taylor Hatch serving as members as well.